Adrienne McKibbins writes: Since the Internet has come into full force there has been a plethora of websites and blog sites emerge about cinema, these include sites dedicated to various national cinemas. India is no exception; in fact I would guess with the multitude of individual industries in India, they have more sites dedicated to film than many other countries. The Hindi cinema alone has an enormous number of sites covering their industry, some serious, some (because of the nature of Hindi film), very starry and gossip based.
One of the very best sites for those interested in Hindi Cinema is Film Companion, headed by Anupama Chopra. This is a portal that can reach the non-Hindi speaker, or those who don't know a lot about Indian cinema. Film Companion gives the viewer an insight into the industry and how it works, particularly with the many pre-release interviews with film makers. Anupama presents a variety of interviews with directors, producers, actors, actresses’ composers and others in the industry. The interviews are always substantial, because not only is she passionate about cinema, but obviously considerable research is done for each interview.
Having been part of the media for some time and with her reputation, those she interviews nearly always seem at ease. The fact that she can interview a director/star, but not fully endorse his or her film, yet have that same director or star back on the show for their next film, only speaks to her professionalism. Her weekly reviews of contemporary cinema are very reliable, and an excellent guide to the worth of the film. As with any reviewer one might occasionally disagree, but you can gauge where she is coming from. She is not the only reviewer on Film Companion, so there is opportunity for comparison. (My only grouch with reviews on this site is that on occasion, when discussing plot or script, dialogue will be repeated in Hindi, without English subtitles, hard for the non-Hindi speaker, although the message usually gets through). Reviews on FC often include English Language Films releasing in India.
Anupama Chopra has been writing on Hindi film for a very long time, as an author her books on aspects on Indian cinema are the best available. SRK and the Seductive World of Indian Cinema, is an excellent overview and introduction to contemporary Hindi cinema, following the career of Shah Rukh Khan. The book was written with considerable co-operation from Khan. Two other books of note are on iconic Hindi films, Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge (DDLJ) [available in the BFI series], and Sholay: The Making of a Classic. This book won her a National Award for the Best Book on Cinema. The beauty of Anupama’s writing on Hindi cinema is that her knowledge and passion for Hindi cinema is easily detectable. An enormous number of books have been published in recent years on “Bollywood”, “Bollywood and Globalisation”, as well as aspects of India reflected in Bollywood. Many of these books are extremely academic in nature. When reading them one often has the feel it’s just a “topic” and the author may have only seen a limited number of Hindi films. However, it is clear with Ms Chopra’s writing, that she has seen an incredible number of films and takes joy in relaying the information to others.
For those interested in investigating and navigating the ins and outs of Hindi cinema further, its worth reading the above mentioned books, and also First Day, First Show, where Chopra, in an almost can’t put down book, presented as a series of essays, delves into the background of stars, along with stories of those who never really made it, discusses independent filmmakers and the industry’s history to the Mumbai underworld.
Anupama Chopra is also the Director of the Jio MAMI Mumbai Film Festival.
Film Companion describes itself as follows: - FC is a celebration of the movies. It’s a platform that is committed to quality journalism, which is well researched and balanced, and it isn’t paid news. We bring you engaging and informative content on movies that includes, reviews of films and webs shows, interviews, film festival news, features and master-classes.
As a dedicated viewer of Indian cinema, I can vouch that what they say is true. It’s always a touchstone to see what issues the industry is facing, along with genuinely balanced and informative reviews. Of course it’s not the only good gateway into Hindi cinema, but it is certainly one of the best. Below is a piece recently published on Film Companion
Initially, I saw a festival the way others did. If a movie is selected in a festival, it could wear that as a badge. It was certifiably good enough. Festivals were a way for your film to reach audiences everywhere. In 1999, I was ecstatic when two films that I had written – Satya and …Jayate – became part of IFFI’s Indian Panorama. Cannes, Berlin and Venice were just names. I had no passport at the point, so they were literally out of reach. In 2003, my unreleased Paanch was chosen to close Osian’s Cinefan Festival in Delhi, and I think it was only then that I realised the true value of a festival. Had my film released theatrically, I wouldn’t have discovered film festivals. They would have remained the Olympics. Not even the Commonwealth or Asiad. If you were at a festival, that was the pinnacle.
In the past few years, I have been on several juries – Sundance, Venice, Busan, Marrakesh, Copenhagen – but at Cannes, for instance, I prefer that my film be included as part of the Director’s Fortnight instead of the main competition. How can you compare two films, made in two different circumstances, dealing with different politics, made in countries that have different levels of censorship, that deal with different kinds of moralities? In my head, they can’t. I am constantly circumventing the system to figure out what I can do and put out. I have so many battles to fight, and I am competing with another filmmaker who has all the freedom to explore so much more and I already look at him with envy even before we’ve started. I genuinely believe that films can’t compete with each other, but you can’t take away that pleasure from people. More than anything else, competition creates some excitement for the festival and the market, so it is a necessary evil. Wherever there’s a cash prize, I immediately enter my film in the competition. Any kind of a recovery, you see, is recovery after all.
When you’re a member of a jury, you understand what kind of films work in which market. For me, my entire journey is about the survival of cinema I believe in. Festivals take me everywhere. When I meet people, I realise they have different struggles, some much bigger than mine. This makes me calmer. I’m less edgy. I no longer think that nobody wants to watch my films. Others don’t have a healthy film industry like ours. I make a film every year. Not everyone can do that. But when I realised I have to actively find my audience, I decided I had to minimise cost. It’s very important that my film recover its cost in India. I know I make films that won’t have a ready audience, that’ll get people angry, that my morality will be questioned. If my cost is minimal and once the recovery is done, I can worry less. My film builds its value in the future. A film earns its shelf life when it travels. I know that I can’t make a film that is going to please every market. I know I am making genre films. I am not an arthouse filmmaker. So, for my films to be seen, I needed to figure out my give and take.
Almost every Indian city – big and small – now has a film festival. The good thing about this is that people in smaller towns are getting exposed to cinema they wouldn’t otherwise have seen. But because everything is driven with an agenda of branding, there is something essential that is being lost. You can’t make an audience suddenly jump into the deep blue sea. You have to take them there slowly. If an education about cinema is the final goal, it has to be a long term process. In small town India, people go to a festival if they are told that a celebrity will be coming or if they’re told that a film has a great sex scene. These reasons have nothing to do with cinema and that is a big problem.
Festivals like MAMI and the International Film Festival of Kerala are exceptions. At MAMI, for instance, the best section would have to be India Gold. It shows our films to the world. Those are the films we want people to watch. In 1993, there was a sense of magic when you were at a festival like IFFI. The films that were shown were rare and not widely available. Because of this, there was this alluring sense of temptation which is now missing. Today, people go to festivals to watch the films they had missed out on during the year. It’s like ticking a checklist. There’s just no sense of discovery.
Young Indian filmmakers need to wise up more. They are scared that their films will be pirated the minute they’re shown in a festival. Some do not trust themselves. They fear bad reviews. People have to learn how to evaluate their films. You don’t take a genre film to an arthouse festival. It will be slaughtered. A festival is your stepping stone to bounce into the world. A movie like Court, for instance, would have been lost if it wasn’t discovered at Venice. Gurvinder Singh isn’t out to please crowds. He wouldn’t survive if his films (Anhe Ghore Da Daan, Chauthi Koot) weren’t being celebrated in festivals. Anup Singh’s Qissa comes to India and nobody sees it, but it travels all across the world and survives. Parched is already a massive success in film festivals across the world, but it still hasn’t released in India. Its director Leena Yadav, though, has found courage. Nobody can stop her from making the films she wants to. Film festivals give us strength. They make better filmmakers.